" DISCLAIMER: The ILO does not take responsibility for content presented on this web portal that is presented in any language other than English, which is the language used for the initial production and peer-review of original content. Certain statistics have not been updated since the production of the 4th edition of the Encyclopaedia (1998)."

Monday, 28 March 2011 19:31

Hazards in Sewage (Waste) Treatment Plants

Written by
Rate this item
(6 votes)

Without treatment of waste the current concentration of people and industry in many parts of the world would very quickly make portions of the environment incompatible with life. Although reduction of the amount of waste is important, the proper treatment of waste is essential. Two basic types of waste enter a treatment plant, human/animal waste and industrial waste. Humans excrete about 250 grams of solid waste per capita per day, including 2000 million coliform and 450 million streptococci bacteria per person per day (Mara 1974). Industrial solid waste production rates range from 0.12 tons per employee per year at professional and scientific institutions to 162.0 tons per employee per year at sawmills and planing mills (Salvato 1992). Although some waste treatment plants are exclusively dedicated to handling one or the other type of material, most plants handle both animal and industrial waste.

Hazards and Their Prevention

The goal of waste water treatment plants is to remove as much of the solid, liquid and gaseous contaminants as possible within technically feasible and financially achievable constraints. There are a variety of different processes that are used to remove contaminants from waste water including sedimentation, coagulation, flocculation, aeration, disinfection, filtration and sludge treatment. (See also the article “Sewage treatment” in this chapter.) The specific hazard associated with each process varies depending on the design of the treatment plant and the chemicals used in the different processes, but the types of hazard can be classified as physical, microbial and chemical. The key to preventing and/or minimizing the adverse effects associated with working in sewage treatment plants is to anticipate, recognize, evaluate and control the hazards.

Figure 1. Manhole with cover removed.


Mary O. Brophy

Physical hazards

Physical hazards include confined spaces, inadvertent energizing of machines or machine parts and trips and falls. The result of an encounter with a physical hazards can often be immediate, irreversible and serious, even fatal. Physical hazards vary with the design of the plant. Most sewage treatment plants, however, have confined spaces which include underground or below grade vaults with limited access, manholes (figure 1) and the sedimentation tanks when they have been emptied of liquid content during, for example, repairs (figure 2). Mixing equipment, sludge rakes, pumps and mechanical devices used for a variety of operations in sewage treatment plants can maim, and even kill, if they are inadvertently activated when a worker is servicing them. Wet surfaces, often encountered in sewage treatment plants, contribute to slipping and falling hazards.

Figure 2. Empty tank in a sewage treatment plant.


Mary O. Brophy

Confined-space entry is one of the most common and one of the most serious hazards faced by sewage treatment workers. A universal definition of a confined space is elusive. In general, however, a confined space is an area with limited means of entry and egress that was not designed for continuous human habitation and that does not have adequate ventilation. Hazards occur when the confined space is associated with a deficiency of oxygen, the presence of a toxic chemical or an engulfing material, such as water. Decreased oxygen levels can be the result of a variety of conditions including the replacement of oxygen with another gas, such as methane or hydrogen sulphide, the consumption of oxygen by the decay of organic material contained in the waste water or the scavenging of oxygen molecules in the rusting process of some structure within the confined space. Because low levels of oxygen in confined spaces cannot be detected by unaided human observation it is extremely important to use an instrument that can determine the level of oxygen before entering any confined space.

The earth’s atmosphere consists of 21% oxygen at sea level. When the percentage of oxygen in breathing air falls below about 16.5% a person’s breathing becomes more rapid and more shallow, the heart rate increases and the person begins to lose coordination. Below about 11% the person experiences nausea, vomiting, inability to move and unconsciousness. Emotional instability and impaired judgement may occur at oxygen levels somewhere between these two points. When individuals enter an atmosphere with oxygen levels below 16.5% they may immediately become too disoriented to get themselves out and eventually succumb to unconsciousness. If the oxygen depletion is great enough individuals can become unconscious after one breath. Without rescue they can die within minutes. Even if rescued and resuscitated, permanent damage can occur (Wilkenfeld et al. 1992).

Lack of oxygen is not the only hazard in a confined space. Toxic gases can be present in a confined space at a concentration level high enough to do serious harm, even kill, despite adequate oxygen levels. The effects of toxic chemicals encountered in confined spaces are discussed further below. One of the most effective ways to control the hazards associated with low oxygen levels (below 19.5%) and atmospheres contaminated with toxic chemicals is to thoroughly and adequately ventilate the confined space with mechanical ventilation prior to allowing anyone to enter it. This is usually done with a flexible duct through which outside air is blown into the confined space (see figure 3). Care must be taken to ensure that fumes from a generator or the fan motor are not also blown into the confined space (Brophy 1991).

Figure 3. Air moving unit for entering a confined space.


Mary O. Brophy

Sewage treatment plants often have large pieces of machinery to move sludge or raw sewage from one place in the plant to another. When repairs are made on this type of equipment the entire machine should be de-energized. Furthermore, the switch to re-energize the equipment should be under the control of the person performing the repairs. This prevents another worker in the plant from inadvertently energizing the equipment. Development and implementation of procedures to achieve these goals is called a lockout/tagout programme. Mutilation of body parts, such as fingers, arms and legs, dismemberment and even death can result from ineffective or inadequate lockout/tagout programmes.

Sewage treatment plants often contain large tanks and storage containers. People sometimes need to work on top of the containers, or walk by pits that have been emptied of water and may contain an 8 to 10 foot (2.5 to 3 m) drop (see figure 4). Sufficient protection against falls as well as adequate safety training should be provided for the workers.

Microbial hazards

Microbial hazards are primarily associated with the treatment of human and animal waste. Although bacteria are often added to alter the solids contained in waste water, the hazard to sewage treatment workers comes primarily from exposure to micro-organisms contained in human and other animal waste. When aeration is used during the sewage treatment process these micro-organisms can become airborne. The long term effect on the immune system of individuals exposed to these micro-organisms for extended periods of time has not been conclusively evaluated. In addition, workers who remove solid refuse from the influent stream before any treatment is begun are often exposed to micro-organisms contained in material splashing onto their skin and making contact with the mucous membranes. The results of encountering micro-organisms found in sewage treatment plants for extended periods of time are often more subtle than resulting from acute intense exposures. Nevertheless, these effects can also be irreversible and serious.

The three main categories of microbes relevant to this discussion are fungi, bacteria and viruses. All three of these can cause acute illness as well as chronic disease. Acute symptoms including respiratory distress, abdominal pains and diarrhoea have been reported in waste treatment workers (Crook, Bardos and Lacey 1988; Lundholm and Rylander 1980). Chronic diseases, such as asthma and allergic alveolitis, have been traditionally associated with exposure to high levels of airborne microbes and, recently, with microbial exposure during the treatment of domestic waste (Rosas et al. 1996; Johanning, Olmstead and Yang 1995). Reports of significantly elevated concentrations of fungi and bacteria in waste treatment, sludge dewatering and composting facilities are beginning to be published (Rosas et al. 1996; Bisesi and Kudlinski 1996; Johanning Olmstead and Yang 1995). Another source of airborne microbes is the aeration tanks which are used in many sewage treatment plants.

In addition to inhalation, microbes can be transmitted through ingestion and through contact with skin that is not intact. Personal hygiene, including washing hands before eating, smoking and going to the bathroom, is important. Food, drink, eating utensils, cigarettes and anything that would be put into the mouth should be kept away from areas of possible microbial contamination.

Chemical hazards

Chemical encounters at waste treatment plants can be both immediate and fatal, as well as protracted. A variety of chemicals are used in the process of coagulation, flocculation, disinfection and sludge treatment. The chemical of choice is determined by the contaminant or contaminants in the raw sewage; some industrial waste requires somewhat exotic chemical treatment. In general, however, the primary hazards from chemicals used in the coagulation and flocculation processes are skin irritation and eye injury due to direct contact. This is especially true of solutions which have a pH (acidity) less than 3 or greater than 9. The disinfection of effluent is often achieved by using either liquid or gaseous chlorine. Use of liquid chlorine can cause eye injury if splashed into the eyes. Ozone and ultraviolet light are also used to achieve disinfection of the effluent.

One way to monitor the effectiveness of sewage treatment is to measure the amount of organic material which remains in the effluent after treatment is complete. This can be done by determining the amount of oxygen that would be required to biodegrade the organic material contained in 1 litre of liquid over a period of 5 days. This is referred to as the 5-day biological oxygen demand (BOD5).

Chemical hazards in sewage treatment plants arise from the decomposition of organic material which results in the production of hydrogen sulphide and methane, from toxic waste dumped down the sewer lines and from the contaminants produced by operations performed by the workers themselves.

Hydrogen sulphide is almost always found in waste treatment plants. Hydrogen sulphide, also known as sewer gas, has a distinctive, unpleasant smell, often identified as rotten eggs. The human nose, however, quickly becomes accustomed to the smell. People who are exposed to hydrogen sulphide often lose their ability to detect its odour (i.e., olfactory fatigue). Furthermore, even if the olfactory system is able to detect hydrogen sulphide, it is not able to accurately judge its concentration in the atmosphere. Hydrogen sulphide biochemically interferes with the electron transport mechanism and blocks the utilization of oxygen at the molecular level. The result is asphyxiation and ultimately death due to the lack of oxygen in the brainstem cells that control the breathing rate. High levels of hydrogen sulphide (greater than 100 ppm) can, and often do, occur in the confined spaces found in sewage treatment plants. Exposure to very high levels of hydrogen sulphide can result in almost instantaneous suppression of the respiratory centre in the brainstem. The US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has identified 100 ppm of hydrogen sulphide as immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH). Lower levels of hydrogen sulphide (less than 10 ppm) are almost always present in some areas of sewage treatment plants. At these lower levels hydrogen sulphide can be irritating to the respiratory system, be associated with headaches and result in conjunctivitis (Smith 1986). Hydrogen sulphide is produced whenever organic matter decays and, industrially, during the production of paper (Kraft process), the tanning of leather (hair removal with sodium sulphide), and the production of heavy water for nuclear reactors.

Methane is another gas produced by the decomposition of organic matter. In addition to displacing oxygen, methane is explosive. Levels can be reached which result in an explosion when a spark or source of ignition is introduced.

Plants that handle industrial waste should have a thorough knowledge of the chemicals used in each of the industrial plants that utilize their services and a working relationship with the management of those plants so that they are promptly informed of any changes in processes and waste contents. Dumping of solvents, fuels and any other substance into sewer systems presents a hazard to treatment workers not only because of the toxicity of the material dumped but also because the dumping is unanticipated.

Whenever any industrial operation, such as welding or spray painting, is performed in a confined space special care must be taken to provide sufficient ventilation to prevent an explosion hazard as well as to remove toxic material produced by the operation. When an operation performed in a confined space produces a toxic atmosphere it is often necessary to equip the worker with a respirator because ventilation of the confined space may not ensure that the concentration of the toxic chemical can be maintained below the permissible exposure limit. Selection and fitting of a proper respirator falls within the purview of industrial hygiene practice.

Another serious chemical hazard in sewage treatment plants is the use of gaseous chlorine to decontaminate the effluent from the plant. The gaseous chlorine comes in a variety of containers weighing from 70 kg to roughly 1 tonne. Some of the very large sewage treatment plants use chlorine delivered in railroad cars. Gaseous chlorine is extremely irritating to the alveolar portion of the lungs, even in levels as low as a few ppm. Inhalation of higher concentrations of chlorine can cause inflammation of the alveoli of the lung and produce the adult respiratory distress syndrome, which has a 50% death rate. When a sewage treatment plant utilizes large amounts of chlorine (1 tonne and greater) the hazard exists not only for the plant workers but for the surrounding community as well. Unfortunately, the plants that use the largest amounts of chlorine are often located in large metropolitan centres with high density of people. Other methods of decontamination of sewage treatment plant effluent are available, including ozone treatment, the use of liquid hypochlorite solution and ultraviolet irradiation.



Read 20798 times Last modified on Tuesday, 06 September 2011 14:07


Part I. The Body
Part II. Health Care
Part III. Management & Policy
Part IV. Tools and Approaches
Part V. Psychosocial and Organizational Factors
Part VI. General Hazards
Part VII. The Environment
Part VIII. Accidents and Safety Management
Part IX. Chemicals
Part X. Industries Based on Biological Resources
Part XI. Industries Based on Natural Resources
Part XII. Chemical Industries
Part XIII. Manufacturing Industries
Part XIV. Textile and Apparel Industries
Part XV. Transport Industries
Part XVI. Construction
Part XVII. Services and Trade
Education and Training Services
Emergency and Security Services
Entertainment and the Arts
Health Care Facilities and Services
Hotels and Restaurants
Office and Retail Trades
Personal and Community Services
Public and Government Services
Transport Industry and Warehousing
Part XVIII. Guides

Public and Government Services Additional Resources

Click the Button below to view additional resources for this topic.


Public and Government Services References

American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 1989. Guidelines for the Assessment of Bioaerosols in the Indoor Environment. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.

Angerer, J, B Heinzow, DO Reimann, W Knorz, and G Lehnert. 1992. Internal exposure to organic substances in a municipal waste incinerator. Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 64(4):265-273.

Asante-Duah, DK, FK Saccomanno, and JH Shortreed. 1992. The hazardous waste trade: Can it be controlled? Environ Sci Technol 26:1684-1693.

Beede, DE and DE Bloom. 1995. The economics of municipal solid waste. World Bank Research Observer. 10(2):113-115.

Belin, L. 1985. Health problems caused by actinomycetes and moulds in the industrial environment. Allergy Suppl. 40:24-29.

Bisesi, M and D Kudlinski. 1996. Measurement of airborne gram-negative bacteria in selected areas of a sludge dewatering building. Presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, 20-24 May, Washington, DC.

Botros, BA, AK Soliman, M Darwish, S el Said, JC Morrill, and TG Ksiazek. 1989. Seroprevalence of murine typhus and fievre boutonneuse in certain human populations in Egypt. J Trop Med Hyg. 92(6):373-378.

Bourdouxhe, M, E Cloutier, and S Guertin. 1992. Étude des risques d’accidents dans la collecte des ordures ménagères. Montreal: Institut de recherche en santé de la sécurité du travail.

Bresnitz, EA, J Roseman, D Becker, and E Gracely. 1992. Morbidity among municipal waste incinerator workers. Am J Ind Med 22 (3):363-378.

Brophy, M. 1991. Confined space entry programs. Water Pollution Control Federation Safety and Health Bulletin (Spring):4.

Brown, JE, D Masood, JI Couser, and R Patterson. 1995. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis from residential composting: residential composter’s lung. Ann Allergy, Asthma & Immunol 74:45-47.

Clark, CS, R Rylander, and L Larsson. 1983. Levels of gram-negative bacteria, aspergillus fumigatus, dust and endotoxin at compost plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:1501-1505.

Cobb, K and J Rosenfield. 1991. Municipal Compost Management Home Study Program. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Waste Management Institute.

Cointreau-Levine, SJ. 1994. Private Sector Participation in MSW Services in Developing Countries: The Formal Sector, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Colombi, A. 1991. Health risks for waste disposal industry workers (in Italian). Med Lav 82(4):299-313.

Coughlin, SS. 1996. Environmental justice: The role of epidemiology in protecting unempowered communities from environmental hazards. Sci Total Environ 184:67-76.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). 1993. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS.

Cray, C. 1991. Waste Management Inc.: An Encyclopedia of Environmental Crimes and Other
Misdeeds, 3rd (revised) edition. Chicago, IL: Greenpeace USA.

Crook, B, P Bardos, and J Lacey. 1988. Domestic waste composting plants as source of airborne microorganisms. In Aerosols: Their Generation, Behavior and Application, edited by WD Griffiths. London: Aerosol Society.

Desbaumes, P. 1968. Study of risks inherent in industries treating refuse and sewage (in French). Rev Med Suisse Romande 88(2):131-136.

Ducel, G, JJ Pitteloud, C Rufener-Press, M Bahy, and P Rey. 1976. The importance of bacterial exposure in sanitation employees when collecting refuse (in French). Soz Praventivmed 21(4):136-138.

Dutch Occupational Health Association. 1989. Protocol Onderzoeksmethoden Micro-biologische Binnenlucht- verontreinigingen [Research Methods in Biological Indoor Air Pollution]. Working Group Report. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dutch Occupational Health Association.

Emery, R, D Sprau, YJ Lao, and W Pryor. 1992. Release of bacterial aerosols during infectious waste compaction: An initial hazard evaluation for healthcare workers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 53(5):339-345.

Gellin, GA and MR Zavon. 1970. Occupational dermatoses of solid waste workers. Arch Environ Health 20(4):510-515.

Greenpeace. 1993. We’ve Been Had! Montreal’s Plastics Dumped Overseas. Greenpeace International Toxic Trade Report. Washington, DC: Greenpeace Public Information.

—. 1994a. The Waste Invasion of Asia: A Greenpeace Inventory. Greenpeace Toxic Trade Report. Washington, DC: Greenpeace Public Information.

—. 1994b. Incineration. Greenpeace Inventory of Toxic Technologies. Washington, DC: Greenpeace Public Information.

Gustavsson, P. 1989. Mortality among workers at a municipal waste incinerator. Am J Ind Med 15(3):245-253.

Heida, H, F Bartman, and SC van der Zee. 1975. Occupational exposure and indoor air quality monitoring in a composting facility. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 56(1): 39-43.

Johanning, E, E Olmsted, and C Yang. 1995. Medical issues related to municipal waste composting. Presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, 22-26 May, Kansas City, KS.

Knop W. 1975. Work safety in incinerator plants (in German) Zentralbl Arbeitsmed 25(1):15-19.

Kramer, MN, VP Kurup, and JN Fink. 1989. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis from a contaminated dump site. Am Rev Respir Dis 140:1086-1088.

Lacey, J, PAM Williamson, P King, and RP Barbos. 1990. Airborne Microorganisms Associated with Domestic Waste Composting. Stevenage, UK: Warren Spring Laboratory.

Lundholm, M and R Rylander. 1980. Occupational symptoms among compost workers. J Occup Med 22(4):256-257.

Malkin, R, P Brandt-Rauf, J Graziano, and M Parides. 1992. Blood lead levels in incinerator workers. Environ Res 59(1):265-270.

Malmros, P and P Jonsson. 1994. Wastes management: Planning for recycling workers’ safety. Waste Management & Resource Recovery 1:107-112.

Malmros, P, T Sigsgaard and B Bach. 1992. Occupational health problems due to garbage sorting. Waste Management & Research 10:227-234.

Mara, DD. 1974. Bacteriology for Sanitary Engineers. London: Churchill Livingstone.

Maxey, MN. 1978. Hazards of solid waste management: bioethical problems, principles, and priorities. Environ Health Perspect 27:223-230.

Millner, PD, SA Olenchock, E Epstein, R Rylander, J Haines, and J Walker. 1994. Bioaerosols associated with composting facilities. Compost Science and Utilization 2:3-55.

Mozzon, D, DA Brown, and JW Smith. 1987. Occupational exposure to airborne dust, respirable quartz and metals arising from refuse handling, burning and landfilling. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 48(2):111-116.

Nersting, L, P Malmros, T Sigsgaard, and C Petersen. 1990. Biological health risk associated with resource recovery, sorting of recycle waste and composting. Grana 30:454-457.

Paull, JM and FS Rosenthal. 1987. Heat strain and heat stress for workers wearing protective suits at a hazardous waste site. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 48(5):458-463.

Puckett, J and C Fogel 1994. A Victory for Environment and Justice: The Basel Ban and How It Happened. Washington, DC: Greenpeace Public Information.

Rahkonen, P, M Ettala, and I Loikkanen. 1987. Working conditions and hygiene at sanitary landfills in Finland. Ann Occup Hyg 31(4A):505-513.

Robazzi, ML, E Gir, TM Moriya, and J Pessuto. 1994. The trash collection service: Occupational risks versus damages to health (in Portuguese). Rev Esc Enferm USP 28(2):177-190.

Rosas, I, C Calderon, E Salinas, and J Lacey. 1996. Airborne microorganisms in a domestic waste transfer station. In Aerobiology, edited by M Muilenberg and H Burge. New York: Lewis Publishers.

Rummel-Bulska, I. 1993. The Basel Convention: A global approach for the management of hazardous wastes. Paper presented at the Pacific Basin Conference on Hazardous Waste, University of Hawaii, November.

Salvato, JA. 1992. Environmental Engineering and Sanitation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Schilling, CJ, IP Tams, RS Schilling, A Nevitt, CE Rossiter, and B Wilkinson. 1988. A survey into the respiratory effects of prolonged exposure to pulverised fuel ash. Br J Ind Med 45(12):810-817.

Shrivastava, DK, SS Kapre, K Cho, and YJ Cho. 1994. Acute lung disease after exposure to fly ash. Chest 106(1):309-311.

Sigsgaard, T, A Abel, L Donbk, and P Malmros. 1994. Lung function changes among recycling workers exposed to organic dust. Am J Ind Med 25:69-72.

Sigsgaard, T, B Bach, and P Malmros. 1990. Respiratory impairment among workers in a garbage-handling plant. Am J Ind Med 17(1):92-93.

Smith, RP. 1986. Toxic responses of the blood. In Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology, edited by CD Klaassen, MO Amdur, and J Doull. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Soskolne, C. 1997. International transport of hazardous waste: Legal and illegal trade in the context of professional ethics. Global Bioethics (September/October).

Spinaci, S, W Arossa, G Forconi, A Arizio, and E Concina. 1981. Prevalence of functional bronchial obstruction and identification of groups at risk in a population of industrial workers (in Italian). Med Lav 72(3):214-221.

Southam News. 1994. Export ban on toxic waste proposed. Edmonton Journal (9 March):A12.

van der Werf, P. 1996. Bioaerosols at a Canadian composting facility. Biocycle (September): 78-83.
Vir, AK. 1989. Toxic trade with Africa. Environ Sci Technol 23:23-25.

Weber, S, G Kullman, E Petsonk, WG Jones, S Olenchock, and W Sorensen. 1993. Organic dust exposures from compost handling: Case presentation and respiratory exposure assessment. Am J Ind Med 24:365-374.

Wilkenfeld, C, M Cohen, SL Lansman, M Courtney, MR Dische, D Pertsemlidis, and LR Krakoff. 1992. Heart transplantation for end-stage cardiomyopathy caused by an occult pheochromocytoma. J Heart Lung Transplant 11:363-366.