Monday, 28 March 2011 19:40

Draught Animals in Asia

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Livestock contributes significantly to the life of small farmers, nomads and foresters all over the world and increases their productivity, income, employment and nutrition. This contribution is expected to rise. The world population will rise from its present 4.8–5.4 billion people to at least 10 billion in the next 100 years. The population of Asia can be expected to double over that same period. The demand for food will rise even more as the standard of living also rises. Along with this will be a rise in the need for draught power to produce the increased food required. According to Ramaswami and Narasimhan (1982), 2 billion people in the developing countries depend on draught animal power for farming and rural transportation. Draught power is critically short at the time of crop planting and is insufficient for other purposes throughout the year. Draught power will remain a major source of energy in agriculture into the foreseeable future, and the lack of draught power in some places may be the primary constraint to increasing crop production.

Animal draught power was the first supplement to human energy inputs in agriculture. Mechanized power has been used in agriculture only in the last century or so. In Asia, a greater proportion of farmers depend on animals for draught power than in any other parts of the world. A large proportion of these animals belong to farmers who have limited resources and cultivate small areas of land. In most parts of Asia, animal power is supplied by bullocks, buffalo and camels. Bullocks will continue to be the common source of farm power, mainly because they are adequate and live on waste residues. Elephants are also used in some places.

Production

In Asian countries, there are three main sources of power used in agriculture: human, mechanical and animal. Human beings provide the main source of power in developing countries for hoeing, weeding, rice transplanting, seed broadcasting and harvesting of crops. Mechanical power with its versatility is used for practically all the field operations, and the intensity of usage varies considerably from one developing country to another (Khan 1983). Animal power is generally used for tillage operations, haulage and operation of some water-lifting devices. A draught cow is a multipurpose farm animal, providing power, milk, dung, calves and meat. Normal draught power of various animals is presented in table 1.

Table 1. Normal draught power of various animals

Animals

Weight (kg)

Approx. draught (kg)

Average speed of work (m/sec)

Power developed (h.p.)

Light horses

400–700

60–80

1.0

1.00

Bullocks

500–900

60–80

0.6–0.85

0.75

Buffaloes

400–900

50–80

0.8–0.90

0.75

Cows

400–600

50–60

0.7

0.45

Mules

350–500

50–60

0.9–1.0

0.70

Donkeys

200–300

30–40

0.7

0.35

Source: FAO 1966.

To have better draught animal power the following aspects should be considered:

For landless people to repay a loan for purchase of bullocks, feed them, and earn sufficient income to meet everyday costs, they must be able to work their animals for six hours per day.

  • Draught animal nutrition. Animal nutrition is a principal factor in increasing the productivity of draught animal power. This is possible only if the necessary feed is available. In some areas, more effort is made to ensure the best use of available resources, such as treating straw with alkali (molasses urea block (MUB)) to improve its nutrient availability. As draught power availability is presently limiting the production of staple crops (there is an estimated 37% deficiency in draught requirements at the time of harvest), a primary objective is to produce draught animals and improve the efficiency of draught power. The opportunity to use improved nutritional technology (e.g., MUB) may assist draught power development through improved animal work capacity and reproduction rates in the female herd as well as better growth of young animals, which will lead to larger body size.
  • Breeding and selection. Culling of local unproductive breed bulls and selection of the best local bull is necessary. Draught animals are currently selected according to their conformation, temperament and health; however, farmers often must rely on what is available locally.

Some crossbreds show a significant increase not only in milk and meat producing capability, but also in draught power. In India, Pakistan and Australia there have been tremendous efforts made in cross-breeding buffalo, cattle, horses (to produce mules) and, in some places, camels. This has produced very encouraging results. In many other Asian countries, especially developing countries, this research work for improving draught power as well as milk and meat production is very much needed.

  • Equipment. Most farm equipment is old and unproductive. Much of the equipment that is used in conjunction with draught animals (harnesses, cultivation tools and carts) is of traditional type, the design of which has not changed for hundreds of years. In addition, farm implements are often badly designed and achieve low work output.
  • Health. The stress of working may upset the balance which often exists between healthy animals and parasites.

 

Management

The daily feeding of draught animals varies according to work season. Both draught cattle and buffalo are fed in confinement (year-round) through a cut and carry system, with little or no grazing. Rice straw is fed all year long, depending on farmer preference, at either a measured rate of 8 to 10 kg per day or as necessary. Other crop residues such as rice hulls, pulse straw and cane tops are fed when available. In addition to these crop residues, cut or grazed green grass from roadsides and embankments is fed during the rainy season (April into November) at the rate of 5 to 7 kg/day and may be increased during times of heavy work to 10 kg/day.

Draught animal feed is usually supplemented with small amounts of by-product concentrates such as brans, oil cakes, pulses, rice hulls and molasses. The predominant means of feeding concentrates to draught animals is in a liquid form with all of the ingredients mixed together. The types and amounts of ingredients vary according to the daily workload of the animal, the geographical area, farmer preference and capability. Increased amounts of concentrates are fed during the heavy work seasons, and they are reduced during the monsoon season, when the workload is light.

Animal feed ingredients are also chosen by farmers based on availability, price, and their perception and understanding of its feeding value. For example, during the work season from November to June, daily rations may be: 200 g of mustard seed oil cake along with 100 g (dry weight) of boiled rice; 3/4 g of mustard seed oil cake, 100 g boiled rice and 3/4 g of molasses; or 2 kg total of equal parts sesame oil cake, rice polish, wheat bran and boiled rice, along with salt. On actual workdays during this period (163 days), animals are fed an extra 50% of these same rations. If animals are fed any concentrates at all during the non-working season, the rate ranges from 1/4 to 1/2 kg.

Draught Power in Australia

The Australian continent was first colonized by Europeans in 1788. Cattle were introduced with the first ships, but escaped into the surrounding forest. During those days ploughing and other land preparation was done with the heavy bullock plough, and light cultivation either with bullocks or horses. The bullock cart became the standard means of land transport in Australia and remained so until road building and railway construction began and became more widespread following the gold rushes from 1851 onwards.

In Australia other draught animals include the camel and the donkey. Although mules were used, they never became popular in Australia (Auty 1983).

Draught Power in Bangladesh

In Bangladesh livestock play a vital role in the economy, providing both draught power and milk and contributing up to 6.5% of the gross domestic product (GDP) (Khan 1983). Out of the 22 million head of cattle, 90% are used for draught power and transportation. Of this total, 8.2 million are dual purpose, supplying both draught power and dairy products, such as milk and meat (although in minimal amounts) for household consumption and trade. Adding energy value from draught power and dung (fertilizer and fuel), livestock contribute an estimated 11.3% to the GDP.

It has been observed that some cows are used for draught purposes, despite problems with fertility and health complications, which result in lower milk production and fewer calvings per lifetime. While cows are not usually worked during lactation, they contribute significantly to the annual supply of draught power in Bangladesh: 2.14 million (31%) adult female cattle and 60,000 (47%) adult buffalo cows supply animal power (Robertson et al. 1994). When combined with the male workforce, 76% of all adult cattle (11.2 million) and 85 to 90% of all adult buffalo (0.41 million) are used for draught purposes (Khan 1983).

There is no aggregate shortage of draught animals. Rather, the shortfall is based on the quality of draught power available, since malnourished animals are largely unproductive (Orlic and Leng 1992).

There are various breeds of cattle used for draught purposes, including pure deshi cattle and deshi cattle crossed with Sahiwal, Haryana and Red Sindhi cattle and Manipuri, Nili-Ravi and Murrah breeds of buffalo. Deshi bullocks weigh an average of 225 kg, crossbreds are slightly heavier at 275 kg and buffalo weigh an average of 400 kg. Bulls, cows, heifers and bullocks all provide animal power, but bullocks constitute the main workforce.

In Bangladesh, land preparation employs the highest percentage of draught animals. Research workers recommend that land be ploughed six to seven times prior to sowing. However, due to the shortage of draught power, many producers plough only four to five times in preparation for each crop. All ploughs in Bangladesh require two animals. Two bullocks can plough 1 acre in 2.75 (at 6 hours each day) (Orlic and Leng 1992; Robertson et al. 1994).

Draught Power in China

China has a long history of buffalo raising. The animals were used for farming as early as 2,500 years ago. Buffalo have a larger body size than the native cattle. Farmers prefer to use buffalo for farm work because of their great draught power, long working life and docile temperament. One buffalo can provide draught power for the production of 7,500 to 12,500 kg of rice (Yang 1995). Most of them are kept by small-scale farmers for draught purpose. The imported dairy buffalo, Murrah and Nili/Ravi, and crossbreds with these two breeds, are mainly raised on state farms and in research institutes. For centuries, buffalo have been reared mainly for draught purposes. The animals were slaughtered for meat only when they become old or disabled. Milking of buffalo was rare. After generations of selection and breeding, the buffalo have become extremely suitable for working, with deep and strong chests, strong legs, large hoofs and a docile temperament.

In China, buffalo are mainly used for paddy land and for field haulage. They are also employed in raising water, pudding clay for bricks, milling and pressing the juice from sugarcane. The extent of such use is declining due to mechanization. Training of buffalo usually starts at the age of two years. They begin to work a year later. Their working life is longer than that of cattle, usually more than 17 years. It is possible to see buffalo more than 25 years old still working in the fields. They work 90 to 120 days per year in the rice-growing area, with intensive work in the spring and autumn, when they work as long as 7 to 8 hours per day. The working capability varies widely with size, age and sex of the animal. The draught power reaches its maximum between the age of five and 12 years, remains high from 13 to 15 and begins to decline from 16 years. Most of the buffalo bulls are castrated (Yang 1995).

The Shanghai buffalo, one of the largest in China, has an excellent working capability. Working for 8 hours a day, one animal can plough 0.27 to 0.4 hectare of paddy land or 0.4 to 0.53 hectare of non-irrigated land (maximum 0.67 hectare). A load of 800 to 1,000 kg on a wooden-wheeled, bearingless vehicle can be drawn by a buffalo over 24 km within a working day. A buffalo can raise enough water to irrigate 0.73 hectares of paddy land in 4 hours.

In some sugar-producing areas, buffalo are used to draw stone rollers for sugar cane pressing. Six buffalo working in shifts can press 7,500 to 9,000 kg of sugar cane, requiring 15 to 20 minutes for every 1,000 kg.

Draught Power in India

According to Ramaswami and Narasimhan (1982) 70 million bullocks and 8 million buffalo generate about 30,000 million watts of power, assuming the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) average of 0.5 hp output per animal. To generate, transmit and distribute this power at the same multitudinous points of application would call for an investment of 3,000,000 million rupees. It has also been estimated that an investment of 30,000 million rupees has gone into the Indian bullock cart system as against 45,000 million rupees in railways.

The Ministry of Shipping and Transport estimated that 11,700 to 15,000 million tonnes of freight in the urban areas is carried by cart each year, as against the railway haulage of 200,000 million tonnes. In the rural areas, where railroad service is not available, animal-drawn vehicles carry approximately 3,000 million tonnes of freight (Gorhe 1983).

Draught Power in Nepal

In Nepal, bullocks and male buffalo are the main source of draught power for tilling the fields. They are also used for carting, crushing sugar cane and oil seeds and for tracting loads. Due to the topographic nature of the country as well as the high cost of fuel, there is little opportunity for farm mechanization. Therefore, the demand for draught animal power in the country is high (Joshi 1983).

In wheat production, the contribution of bullocks in terms of labour days is 42% in ploughing, 3% in transplanting and 55% in threshing. In paddy production, it is 63% in ploughing, 9% in transplanting and 28% in threshing (Joshi 1983; Stem, Joshi and Orlic 1995).

Depending on the task, draught animals are generally worked a consistent number of hours each day and for a predetermined number of consecutive days before being allowed to rest. For instance, a full day of ploughing averages 6 hours for a bullock, and the average workday for a cow ranges from 4 to 5 hours per day. Animals used for ploughing follow a pattern of 6 to 8 consecutive days of work, followed by 2 days of rest. In the case of threshing, cows or lighter-weight animals usually work for 6 to 8 hours each day. The length and pattern of use for threshing and transport varies according to need. A bullock in full-time ploughing (maximum heavy labour) typically works for 163 days per year.

Draught Power in Sri Lanka

The total cattle population in Sri Lanka is estimated at 1.3 million. Various breeds are used as draught animals. Cattle breeds are used for draught purposes such as transport and ploughing of both wet and dry fields, as well as in farm operations. Indigenous animals have been used popularly in road transport for several decades. Crosses of Indian breeds with the indigenous cattle have resulted in larger animals that are used extensively for road transport. Out of a total buffalo population of 562,000, the number available in the work age range of three to 12 years is estimated at 200,000 males and 92,000 females.

Potential Hazards and Their Control

Other articles in this chapter address hazards and preventive actions for the draught animals discussed in this article. General information on animal behaviour and a checklist for livestock rearing safety practices are found in articles on these subjects and in the article “Animal husbandry”. Horses are addressed in the article “Horses and other equines”. Cattle (and by close association, bullocks and buffalo) are addressed in the article “Cattle, sheep and goats”. “Bull raising” also offers pertinent information on potential hazards and their control.

 

Back

Read 7783 times Last modified on Wednesday, 03 August 2011 23:00
More in this category: « Case Study: Elephants Bull Raising »

" DISCLAIMER: The ILO does not take responsibility for content presented on this web portal that is presented in any language other than English, which is the language used for the initial production and peer-review of original content. Certain statistics have not been updated since the production of the 4th edition of the Encyclopaedia (1998)."

Contents

Preface
Part I. The Body
Part II. Health Care
Part III. Management & Policy
Part IV. Tools and Approaches
Part V. Psychosocial and Organizational Factors
Part VI. General Hazards
Part VII. The Environment
Part VIII. Accidents and Safety Management
Part IX. Chemicals
Part X. Industries Based on Biological Resources
Agriculture and Natural Resources Based Industries
Beverage Industry
Fishing
Food Industry
Forestry
Hunting
Livestock Rearing
Lumber
Paper and Pulp Industry
Part XI. Industries Based on Natural Resources
Part XII. Chemical Industries
Part XIII. Manufacturing Industries
Part XIV. Textile and Apparel Industries
Part XV. Transport Industries
Part XVI. Construction
Part XVII. Services and Trade
Part XVIII. Guides

Livestock Rearing References

Aldhous, P. 1996. Scrapie theory fed BSE complacency, now fears grow for unborn babies. New Scientist 150:4-5.

Ahlgren, GH. 1956. Forage Crops. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 1994. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.

Auty, JH. 1983. Draught animal power in Australia. Asian Livestock VIII:83-84.

Banwart, WC and JM Brenner. 1975. Identification of sulfur gases evolved from animal manures. J Environ Qual 4:363-366.

Baxter, PJ. 1991. Toxic marine and freshwater algae: An occupational hazard? Br J Ind Med 48(8):505-506.

Bell, RG, DB Wilson, and EJ Dew. 1976. Feedlot manure top dressing for irrigated pasture: Good agricultural practice or a health hazard? B Environ Contam Tox 16:536-540.

Benenson, AS. 1990. Control of Communicable Diseases in Man. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.

—. 1995. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.

Brown, LR. 1995. Meat production takes a leap. In Vital Signs 1995: The Trends that are Shaping our Future, edited by LR Brown, N Lenssen, and H Kane. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Bursey, RG. 1992. New uses of dairy products. In New Crops, New Uses, New Markets: Industrial and Commercial Products from U.S. Agriculture: 1992 Yearbook of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA.

Calandruccio, RA and JH Powers. 1949. Farm accidents: A clinical and statistical study covering twenty years. Am Surg (November):652-660.

Cameron, D and C Bishop. 1992. Farm accidents in adults. Br Med J 305:25-26.

Caras, RA. 1996. A Perfect Harmony: The Intertwining Lives of Animals and Humans throughout History. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Carstensen, O, J Lauritsen, and K Rasmussen. 1995. The West-Justland study on prevention of farm accidens, Phase 1: A study of work specific factors in 257 hospital-treated agricultural injuries. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 1:231-239.

Chatterjee, A, D Chattopadhyay, D Bhattacharya, Ak Dutta, and DN Sen Gupta. 1980. Some epidemiologic aspects of zoophilic dermatophytosis. International Journal of Zoonoses 7(1):19-33.

Cherry, JP, SH Fearirheller, TA Foglis, GJ Piazza, G Maerker, JH Woychik, and M Komanowski. 1992. Innovative uses of animal byproducts. In New Crops, New Uses, New Markets: Industrial and Commercial Products from U.S. Agriculture: 1992 Yearbook of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA.

Crowley, M. 1995. Aquaculture trends and technology. National Fisherman 76:18-19.

Deere & Co. 1994. Farm and Ranch Safety Management. Moline, IL: Deere & Co.

DeFoliart, GR. 1992. Insects as human foods. Crop Protection 11:395-399.

Donham, KJ. 1985. Zoonotic diseases of occupational significance in agriculture: A review. International Journal of Zoonoses 12:163-191.

—. 1986. Hazardous agents in agricultural dusts and methods of evaluation. Am J Ind Med 10:205-220.

Donham, KJ and LW Knapp. 1982. Acute toxic exposure to gases from liquid manure. J Occup Med 24:142-145

Donham, KJ and SJ Reynolds. 1995. Respiratory dysfunction in swine production workers: Dose-response relationship of environmental exposures and pulmonary function. Am J Ind Med 27:405-418.

Donham, KJ and L Scallon. 1985. Characterization of dusts collected from swine confinement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 46:658-661.

Donham, KJ and KM Thu. 1995. Agriculture medicine and enivronmental health: The missing component of the sustainable agricultural movement. In Agricultural health and safety: Workplace, Environment, Sustainability, edited by HH McDuffie, JA Dosman, KM Semchuk, SA Olenchock, and A Senthilselvan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Donham, KJ, MJ Rubino, TD Thedell and J Kammenmeyer. 1977. Potential health hazards of workers in swine confinement buildings. J Occup Med 19:383-387.

Donham, KJ, J Yeggy, and RR Dauge. 1985. Chemical and physical parameters of liquid manure from swine confinement facilities: Health implications for workers, swine and the environment. Agricultural Wastes 14:97-113.

—. 1988. Production rates of toxic gases from liquid manure: Health implications for workers and animals in swine buildings. Bio Wastes 24:161-173.

Donham, KJ, DC Zavala, and JA Merchant. 1984. Acute effects of work environment on pulmonary functions of swine confinement workers. Am J Ind Med 5:367-375.

Dosman, JA, BL Graham, D Hall, P Pahwa, H McDuffie, M Lucewicz, and T To. 1988. Respiratory symptoms and alterations in pulmonary function tests in swine producers in Saskatchewan: Results of a survey of farmers. J Occ Med 30:715-720.

Douglas, JDM. 1995. Salmon farming: Occupational health in a new rural industry. Occup Med 45:89-92.

Douglas, JDM and AH Milne. 1991. Decompression sickness in fish farm workers: A new occupational hazard. Br Med J 302:1244-1245.

Durning, AT and HB Brough. 1992. Reforming the livestock economy. In State of the World, edited by LR Brown. London: WW Norton & Company.

Erlich, SM, TR Driscoll, JE Harrison, MS Frommer, and J Leight. 1993. Work-related agricultural fatalities in Australia, 1982-1984. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:162-167.

Feddes, JJR and EM Barber. 1994. Agricultural engineering solutions to problems of air contaminants in farm silos and animal buildings. In Agricultural Health and Safety: Workplace, Environment, Sustainability, edited by HH McDuffie, JA Dosman, KM Semchuk, SA Olenchock and A Senthilselvan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Ferguson, IR and LRC Path. 1993. Rats, fish and Weil’s disease. Safety and Health Practitioner :12-16.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. 1965. Farm Implements for Arid and Tropical Regions. Rome: FAO.

—. 1995. The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome: FAO.

Fretz, P. 1989. Injuries from farm animals. In Principles of Health and Safety in Agriculture, edited by JA Dosman and DW Crockcroft. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Froehlich, PA. 1995. Engineering Control Observations and Recommendations for Insect Rearing Facilities. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH.

Gillespie, JR. 1997. Modern Livestock and Poultry Production. New York: Delmar Publishers.

Gorhe, DS. 1983. Draught animal power vs mechanization. Asian Livestock VIII:90-91.

Haglind, M and R Rylander. 1987. Occupational exposure and lung function measurements among workers in swine confinement buildings. J Occup Med 29:904-907.

Harries, MG and O Cromwell. 1982.Occupational allergy caused by allergy to pig’s urine. Br Med J 284:867.

Heederick, D, R Brouwer, K Biersteker, and J. Boleij. Relationship of airborne endotoxin and bacteria levels in pig farms with lung function and respiratory symptoms of farmers. Intl Arch Occup Health 62:595-601.

Hogan, DJ and P Lane. 1986. Dermatologic disorders in agriculture. Occup Med: State Art Rev 1:285-300.

Holness, DL, EL O’Glenis, A Sass-Kortsak, C Pilger, and J Nethercott. 1987. Respiratory effects and dust exposures in hog confinement farming. Am J Ind Med 11:571-580.

Holness, DL and JR Nethercott. 1994. Acute and chronic trauma in hog farmers. In Agricultural Health and Safety: Workplace, Environment, Sustainability, edited by HH McDuffie, JA Dosman, KM Semchuk, SA Olenchock, and A Senthilselvan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Iowa Department of Public Health. 1995. Sentinel Project Research Agricultural Injury Notification System. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Public Health.

Iverson, M, R Dahl, J. Korsgaard, T Hallas, and EJ Jensen. 1988. Respiratory symptoms in Danish farmers: An epidemiological study of risk factors. Thorax 48:872-877.

Johnson, SA. 1982. Silkworms. Minneapolis, MN: Lerner Publications.

Jones, W, K Morring, SA Olenchock, T Williams, and J. Hickey. 1984. Environmental study of poultry confinement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 45:760-766.

Joshi, DD. 1983. Draught animal power for food production in Nepal. Asian Livestock VIII:86-87.

Ker, A. 1995. Farming Systems in the African Savanna. Ottawa,Canada: IDRC Books.

Khan, MH. 1983. Animal as power source in Asian agriculture. Asian Livestock VIII:78-79.

Kiefer, M. 1996. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH.

Knoblauch, A, B Steiner, S Bachmann, G Trachsler, R Burgheer, and J Osterwalder. 1996. Accidents related to manure in eastern Switzerland: An epidemiological study. Occup Environ Med 53:577-582.

Kok, R, K Lomaliza, and US Shivhare. 1988. The design and performance of an insect farm/chemical reactor for human food production. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 30:307-317.

Kuo, C and MCM Beveridge. 1990. Mariculture: Biological and management problems, and possible engineering solutions. In Engineering for Offshore Fish Farming. London: Thomas Telford.

Layde, PM, DL Nordstrom, D Stueland, LB Wittman, MA Follen, and KA Olsen. 1996. Animal-related occupational injuries in farm residents. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 2:27-37.

Leistikow, B Donham, JA Merchant, and S Leonard. 1989. Assessment of U.S. poultry worker respiratory risk. Am J Ind Med 17:73-74.

Lenhart, SW. 1984. Sources of respiratory insult in the poultry processing industry. Am J Ind Med 6:89-96.

Lincoln, JM and ML Klatt. 1994. Preventing Drownings of Commercial Fishermen. Anchorage, AK: NIOSH.

MacDiarmid, SC. 1993. Risk analysis and the importation of animals and animal products. Rev Sci Tech 12:1093-1107.

Marx, J, J Twiggs, B Ault, J Merchant, and E Fernandez-Caldas. 1993. Inhaled aeroallergen and storage mite reactivity in a Wisconsin farmer nested case-control study. Am Rev Respir Dis 147:354-358.

Mathias, CGT. 1989. Epidemiology of occupational skin disease in agriculture. In Principles of Health and Safety in Aagriculture, edited by JA Dosman and DW Cockroft. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Meadows, R. 1995. Livestock legacy. Environ Health Persp 103:1096-1100.

Meyers, JR. 1997. Injuries among Farm Workers in the United States, 1993. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-115. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH.

Mullan, RJ and LI Murthy. 1991. Occupational sentinel health events: An up-dated list for physician recognition and public health surveillance. Am J Ind Med 19:775-799.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1993. Injuries among Farm Workers in the United states. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH.

—. 1994. Request for Assistance in Preventing Organic Dust Toxic Syndrome. Washington, DC: GPO.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1988. Institutional Administrator’s Manual for Laboratory Animal Care and Use. Washington, DC: GPO.

National Research Council (NRC). 1989. Alternative Agriculture: Committee on the Role of Alternative Farming Methods in Modern Production Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Safety Council. 1982. Accident Facts. Chicago, IL: National Safety Council.

—. 1985. Electrofishing. NSC data sheet I-696-85. Chicago, IL: National Safety Council.

Nesheim, MC, RE Austic, and LE Card. 1979. Poultry Production. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger.

Olenchock, S, J May, D Pratt, L Piacitelli, and J Parker. 1990. Presence of endotoxins in different agricultural environments. Am J Ind Med 18:279-284.

O’Toole, C. 1995. Alien Empire. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Orlic, M and RA Leng. 1992. Prelimenary Proposal to Assist Bangladesh to Improve Ruminant Livestock Productivity and Reduce Methane Emissions. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Global Change Division.

Panti, NK and SP Clark. 1991. Transient hazardous conditions in animal building due to manure gas release during slurry mixing. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 7:478-484.

Platt, AE. 1995. Aquaculture boosts fish catch. In Vital Signs 1995: The Trends that Are Shaping our Future, edited by LR Brown, N Lenssen, and H Kane. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Pursel, VG, CE Rexroad, and RJ Wall. 1992. Barnyard biotchnology may soon produce new medical therapeutics. In New Crops, New Uses, New Markets: Industrial and Commercial Products from U.S. Agriculture: 1992 Yearbook of Agriculture Washington, DC: USDA.

Ramaswami, NS and GL Narasimhan. 1982. A case for building up draught animal power. Kurushetra (India’s Journal for Rural Development) 30:4.

Reynolds, SJ, KJ Donham, P Whitten, JA Merchant, LF Burmeister, and WJ Popendorf. 1996. A longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers. Am J Ind Med 29:33-40.

Robertson, MH, IR Clarke, JD Coghlan, and ON Gill. 1981. Leptospirosis in trout farmers. Lancet: 2(8247)626-627.

Robertson, TD, SA Ribeiro, S Zodrow, and JV Breman. 1994. Assessment of Strategic Livestock Feed Supplementation as an Opportunity for Generating Income for Small Scale Dairy Producers and Reducing Methane Emissions in Bangladesh. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.

Rylander, R. 1994. Symptoms and mechanisms: Inflammation of the lung. Am J Ind Med 25:19-24.

Rylander, R, KJ Donham, C Hjort, R Brouwer, and D Heederik. 1989. Effects of exposure to dust in swine confinement buildings: A working group report. Scand J Work Environ Health 15:309-312.

Rylander, R and N Essle. 1990. Bronchial hyperactivity among pig and dairy farmers. Am J Ind Med 17:66-69.

Rylander, R, Y Peterson, and KJ Donman. 1990. Questionnaire evaluating organic dust exposure. Am J Ind Med 17:121-128.

Rylander, R and R Jacobs. 1994. Organic Dusts: Exposure, Effects and Prevention. Chicago, IL: Lewis Publishing.
Safina, C. 1995. The world’s imperiled fish. Sci Am 272:46-53.

Scherf, BD. 1995. World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity. Rome: FAO.

Schmidt, MJ. 1997. Working elephants. Sci Am 279:82-87.

Schmidt, JO. 1992. Allergy to venomous insects. In The Hive and the Honey Bee, edited by JM Graham. Hamilton: DaDant & Sons.

Shumacher, MJ and NB Egen. 1995. Significance of Africanized bees on public health. Arch Int Med 155:2038-2043.

Sherson, D, I Hansen, and T Sigsgaard. 1989. Occupationally related respiratory symptoms in trout-processing workers. Allergy 44:336-341.

Stem, C, DD Joshi, and M Orlic. 1995. Reducing Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock: Nepal prefeasibility Study. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Global Change Division.

Sweeten, JM. 1995. Odor measurement technology and applications: A state-of-the-art review. In Seventh International Symposium on Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium, edited by CC Ross. American Society of Agricultural Engineering.

Tannahill, R. 1973. Food in History. New York: Stein and Day.

Thorne, PS, KJ Donham, J Dosman, P Jagielo, JA Merchant, and S Von Essen. 1996. Occupational health. In Understanding the Impacts of Large-scale Swine Production, edited by KM Thu, D Mcmillan, and J Venzke. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.

Turner, F and PJ Nichols. 1995. Role of the epithelium in the response of the airways. Abstract for the 19th Cotton and Other Organic Dust Research Conference, 6-7 January, San antonio, TX.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1996. Urban Agriculture: Food, Jobs, and Sustainable Cities. New York: UNDP.

US Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1992. Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.

—. 1996a. Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. Circular Series FL&P 1-96. Washington DC: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.

—. 1996b. Dairy: World Markets and Trade. Circular Series FD 1-96. Washington DC: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.

—. 1997. Poultry Production and Value, 1996 Summary. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.

van Hage-Hamsten, M, S Johansson, and S Hogland. 1985. Storage mite allergy is common in a farming population. Clin Allergy 15:555-564.

Vivian, J. 1986. Keeping Bees. Charlotte, VT: Williamson Publishing.

Waller, JA. 1992. Injuries to farmers and farm families in a dairy state. J Occup Med 34:414-421.

Yang, N. 1995. Research and development of buffalo draught power for farming in China. Asian Livestock XX:20-24.

Zhou, C and JM Roseman. 1995. Agriculture-related residual injuries: Prevalence, type, and associated factors among Alabama farm operators, 1990. Journal of Rural Health 11:251-258.

Zuehlke, RL, CF Mutel, and KJ Donham. 1980. Diseases of Agricultural Workers. Iowa City, IA: Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Iowa.