Saturday, 02 April 2011 18:39

Liquid Crystal Displays

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Liquid crystal displays (LCDs) have been commercially available since the 1970s. They are commonly used in watches, calculators, radios and other products requiring indicators and three or four alphanumeric characters. Recent improvements in the liquid crystal materials allow large displays to be manufactured. While LCDs are only a small portion of the semiconductor industry, their importance has grown with their use in flat-panel displays for portable computers, very light laptop computers and dedicated word processors. The importance of LCDs is expected to continue to grow as they eventually replace the last vacuum tube commonly used in electronics—the cathode ray tube (CRT) (O’Mara 1993).

The manufacture of LCDs is a very specialized process. Industrial hygiene monitoring results indicate very low airborne contaminant levels for the various solvent exposures monitored (Wade et al. 1981). In general, the types and quantities of toxic, corrosive and flammable solid, liquid and gaseous chemicals and hazardous physical agents in use are limited in comparison with other types of semiconductor manufacturing.

Liquid crystal materials are rod-like molecules exemplified by the cyanobiphenyl molecules shown in figure 1. These molecules possess the property of rotating the direction of polarized light passing through. Although the molecules are transparent to visible light, a container of the liquid material appears milky or translucent instead of transparent. This occurs because the long axis of the molecules are aligned at random angles, so the light is scattered randomly. A liquid crystal display cell is arranged so that the molecules follow a specific alignment. This alignment can be changed with an external electric field, allowing the polarization of incoming light to be changed.

Figure 1. Basic liquid crystal polymer molecules

MIC030F1

In the manufacture of flat panel displays, two glass substrates are processed separately, then joined together. The front substrate is patterned to create a colour filter array. The rear glass substrate is patterned to form thin film transistors and the metal interconnect lines. These two plates are mated in the assembly process and, if necessary, sliced and separated into individual displays. Liquid crystal material is injected into a gap between the two glass plates. The displays are inspected and tested and a polarizer film is applied to each glass plate.

Numerous individual processes are required to manufacture flat panel displays. They require specialized equipment, materials and processes. Certain key processes are outlined below.

Glass Substrate Preparation

The glass substrate is an essential and expensive component of the display. Very tight control of the optical and mechanical properties of the material is required at every stage of the process, especially when heating is involved.

Glass fabrication

Two processes are used to make very thin glass with very precise dimensions and reproducible mechanical properties. The fusion process, developed by Corning, utilizes a glass feed rod that melts in a wedge-shaped trough and flows up and over the sides of the trough. Flowing down both sides of the trough, the molten glass joins into a single sheet at the bottom of the trough and can be drawn downward as a uniform sheet. The thickness of the sheet is controlled by the speed of drawing down the glass. Widths of up to almost 1 m can be obtained.

Other manufacturers of glass with the appropriate dimensions for LCD substrates use the float method of manufacturing. In this method, the molten glass is allowed to flow out onto a bed of molten tin. The glass does not dissolve or react with the metallic tin, but floats on the surface. This allows gravity to smooth the surface and allow both sides to become parallel. (See the chapter Glass, ceramics and related materials.)

A variety of substrate sizes are available extending to 450 × 550 mm and larger. Typical glass thickness for flat panel displays is 1.1 mm. Thinner glass is used for some smaller displays, such as pagers, telephones, games and so on.

Cutting, bevelling and polishing

Glass substrates are trimmed to size after the fusion or float process, typically to about 1 m on a side. Various mechanical operations follow the forming process, depending on the ultimate application of the material.

Since glass is brittle and easily chipped or cracked at the edges, these are typically bevelled, chamfered or otherwise treated to reduce chipping during handling. Thermal stresses at edge cracks accumulate during substrate processing and lead to breakage. Glass breakage is a significant problem during production. Besides the possibility of employee cuts and lacerations, it represents a yield loss, and glass fragments might remain in equipment, causing particulate contamination or scratching of other substrates.

Increased substrate size results in increased difficulties for glass polishing. Large substrates are mounted to carriers using wax or other adhesive and polished using a slurry of abrasive material. This polishing process must be followed by a thorough chemical cleaning to remove any remaining wax or other organic residue, as well as the metallic contaminants contained in the abrasive or polishing medium.

Cleaning

Cleaning processes are used for bare glass substrates and for substrates covered with organic films, such as colour filters, polyimide orientation films and so on. Also, substrates with semiconductor, insulator and metal films require cleaning at certain points within the fabrication process. As a minimum, cleaning is required prior to each masking step in colour filter or thin film transistor fabrication.

Most flat panel cleaning employs a combination of physical and chemical methods, with selective use of dry methods. After chemical etching or cleaning, substrates are usually dried using isopropyl alcohol. (See table 1.)

Table 1. Cleaning of flat panel displays

Physical cleaning

Dry cleaning

Chemical cleaning

Brush scrubbing

Ultraviolet ozone

Organic solvent*

Jet spray

Plasma (oxide)

Neutral detergent

Ultrasonic

Plasma (non-oxide)

 

Megasonic

Laser

Pure water

* Common organic solvents used in the chemical cleaning include: acetone, methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, xylene isomers, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene.

Colour Filter Formation

Colour filter formation on the front glass substrate includes some of the glass finishing and preparation steps common to both the front and rear panels, including the bevelling and lapping processes. Operations such as patterning, coating and curing are performed repeatedly on the substrate. Many points of similarity with silicon wafer processing exist. Glass substrates are normally handled in track systems for cleaning and coating.

Colour filter patterning

Various materials and application methods are used to create colour filters for various flat panel display types. Either a dyestuff or a pigment can be used, and either one can be deposited and patterned in several ways. In one approach, gelatin is deposited and dyed in successive photolithographic operations, using proximity printing equipment and standard photoresists. In another, pigments dispersed in photoresist are employed. Other methods for forming colour filters include electrodeposition, etching and printing.

ITO Deposition

After colour filter formation, the final step is the sputter deposition of a transparent electrode material. This is indium-tin oxide (ITO), which is actually a mixture of the oxides In2O3 and SnO2. This material is the only one suitable for the transparent conductor application for LCDs. A thin ITO film is required on both sides of the display. Typically, ITO films are made using vacuum evaporation and sputtering.

Thin films of ITO are easy to etch with wet chemicals such as hydrochloric acid, but, as the pitch of the electrodes becomes smaller and features become finer, dry etching may be necessary to prevent undercutting of the lines due to overetching.

Thin Film Transistor Formation

Thin film transistor formation is very similar to the fabrication of an integrated circuit.

Thin film deposition

The substrates begin the fabrication process with a thin film application step. Thin films are deposited by CVD or physical vapour deposition (PVD). Plasma-enhanced CVD, also known as glow discharge, is used for amorphous silicon, silicon nitride and silicon dioxide.

Device patterning

Once the thin film has been deposited, a photoresist is applied and imaged to allow etching of the thin film to the appropriate dimensions. A sequence of thin films is deposited and etched, as with integrated circuit fabrication.

Orientation Film Application and Rubbing

On both the upper and bottom substrate, a thin polymer film is deposited for orientation of the liquid crystal molecules at the glass surface. This orientation film, perhaps 0.1 μm thick, may be a polyimide or other “hard” polymer material. After deposition and baking, it is rubbed with fabric in a specific direction, leaving barely detectable grooves in the surface. Rubbing can be done with a once through cloth on a belt, fed from a roller on one side, passing under a roller which contacts the substrate, onto a roller on the other side. The substrate moves underneath the cloth in the same direction as the cloth. Other methods include a travelling brush that moves across the substrate. The nap of the rubbing material is important. The grooves serve to aid the liquid crystal molecules to align at the substrate surface and to assume the proper tilt angle.

The orientation film can be deposited by spin coating or by printing. The printing method is more efficient in material usage; 70 to 80% of the polyimide is transferred from the printing roll to the substrate surface.

Assembly

Once the substrate rubbing step is completed, an automated assembly line sequence is begun, which consists of:

  • adhesive application (required for sealing the panels)
  • spacer application
  • location and optical alignment of one plate with respect to the other
  • exposure (heat or UV) to cure the adhesive and bond the two glass plates together.

 

Automated transport of both top and bottom plates occurs through the line. One plate receives the adhesive, and the second plate is introduced at the spacer applicator station.

Liquid Crystal Injection

In the case where more than one display has been constructed on the substrate, the displays are now separated by slicing. At this point, the liquid crystal material can be introduced into the gap between the substrates, making use of a hole left in the seal material. This entrance hole is then sealed and prepared for final inspection. Liquid crystal materials are often delivered as two or three component systems which are mixed at injection. Injection systems provide mixing and purging of the cell to avoid trapping bubbles during the filling process.

Inspection and Test

Inspection and functional testing are performed after assembly and liquid crystal injection. Most defects are related to particles (including point and line defects) and cell gap problems.

Polarizer Attachment

The final manufacturing step for the liquid crystal display itself is the application of the polarizer to the outside of each glass plate. Polarizer films are composite films which contain the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer needed to attach the polarizer to the glass. They are applied by automated machines which dispense the material from rolls or pre-cut sheets. The machines are variants of labelling machines developed for other industries. The polarizing film is attached to both sides of the display.

In some cases, a compensation film is applied prior to the polarizer. Compensation films are polymer films (e.g., polycarbonate and polymethyl methacrylate) that are stretched in one direction. This stretching changes the optical properties of the film.

A completed display will ordinarily have driver integrated circuits mounted on or near one of the glass substrates, usually the thin film transistor side.

Hazards

Glass breakage is a significant hazard in LCD manufacturing. Cuts and lacerations can occur. Exposure to chemicals used for cleaning is another concern.

 

Back

Additional Info

Read 4962 times Last modified on Monday, 05 September 2011 14:54

" DISCLAIMER: The ILO does not take responsibility for content presented on this web portal that is presented in any language other than English, which is the language used for the initial production and peer-review of original content. Certain statistics have not been updated since the production of the 4th edition of the Encyclopaedia (1998)."

Contents

Preface
Part I. The Body
Part II. Health Care
Part III. Management & Policy
Part IV. Tools and Approaches
Part V. Psychosocial and Organizational Factors
Part VI. General Hazards
Part VII. The Environment
Part VIII. Accidents and Safety Management
Part IX. Chemicals
Part X. Industries Based on Biological Resources
Part XI. Industries Based on Natural Resources
Part XII. Chemical Industries
Part XIII. Manufacturing Industries
Electrical Appliances and Equipment
Metal Processing and Metal Working Industry
Microelectronics and Semiconductors
Glass, Pottery and Related Materials
Printing, Photography and Reproduction Industry
Woodworking
Part XIV. Textile and Apparel Industries
Part XV. Transport Industries
Part XVI. Construction
Part XVII. Services and Trade
Part XVIII. Guides

Microelectronics and Semiconductors References

American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 1989. Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.

—. 1993. Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing II. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.

—. 1994. Documentation of Threshold Limit Value, Rosin Core Solder Thermal Decomposition Products, as Resin Acids-Colophony. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.

American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 1986. Safety Standard for Industrial Robots and Industrial Robot Systems. ANSI/RIA R15.06-1986. New York: ANSI.

ASKMAR. 1990. Computer Industry: Critical Trends for the 1990’s. Saratoga, CA: Electronic Trend Publications.

Asom, MT, J Mosovsky, RE Leibenguth, JL Zilko, and G Cadet. 1991. Transient arsine generation during opening of solid source MBE chambers. J Cryst Growth 112(2-3):597–599.

Association of the Electronics, Telecommunications and Business Equipment Industries (EEA). 1991. Guidelines on the Use of Colophony (Rosin) Solder Fluxes in the Electronics Industry. London: Leichester House EEA.

Baldwin, DG. 1985. Chemical exposure from carbon tetrachloride plasma aluminum etchers. Extended Abstracts, Electrochem Soc 85(2):449–450.

Baldwin, DG and JH Stewart. 1989. Chemical and radiation hazards in semiconductor manufacturing. Solid State Technology 32(8):131–135.

Baldwin, DG and ME Williams. 1996. Industrial hygiene. In Semiconductor Safety Handbook, edited by JD Bolmen. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes.

Baldwin, DG, BW King, and LP Scarpace. 1988. Ion implanters: Chemical and radiation safety. Solid State Technology 31(1):99–105.

Baldwin, DG, JR Rubin, and MR Horowitz. 1993. Industrial hygiene exposures in semiconductor manufacturing. SSA Journal 7(1):19–21.

Bauer, S, I Wolff, N Werner, and P Hoffman. 1992a. Health hazards in the semiconductor industry, a review. Pol J Occup Med 5(4):299–314.

Bauer, S, N Werner, I Wolff, B Damme, B Oemus, and P Hoffman. 1992b. Toxicological investigations in the semiconductor industry: II. Studies on the subacute inhalation toxicity and genotoxicity of gaseous waste products from the aluminum plasma etching process. Toxicol Ind Health 8(6):431–444.

Bliss Industries. 1996. Solder Dross Particulate Capture System Literature. Fremont, CA: Bliss Industries.

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 1993. Annual Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Washington, DC: BLS, US Department of Labor.

—. 1995. Employment and Wages Annual Averages, 1994. Bulletin. 2467. Washington, DC: BLS, US Department of Labor.

Clark, RH. 1985. Handbook of Printed Circuit Manufacturing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Cohen, R. 1986. Radiofrequency and microwave radiation in microelectronics industry. In State of the Art Reviews—Occupational Medicine: The Microelectronics Industry, edited by J LaDou. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus, Inc.

Coombs, CF. 1988. Printed Circuits Handbook, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Content, RM. 1989. Control methods for metal and metalloids in III-V materials vapor-phase epitaxy. In Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing, edited by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.

Correa A, RH Gray, R Cohen, N Rothman, F Shah, H Seacat, and M Corn. 1996. Ethylene glycol ethers and risks of spontaneous abortion and subfertility. Am J Epidemiol 143(7):707–717.

Crawford, WW, D Green, WR Knolle, HM Marcos, JA Mosovsky, RC Petersen, PA Testagrossa, and GH Zeman. 1993. Magnetic field exposure in semiconductor cleanrooms. In Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing II. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.

Escher, G, J Weathers, and B Labonville. 1993. Safety design considerations in deep-UV excimer laser photolithography. In Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing II. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.

Eskenazi B, EB Gold, B Lasley, SJ Samuels, SK Hammond, S Wright, MO Razor, CJ Hines, and MB Schenker. 1995. Prospective monitoring of early fetal loss and clinical spontaneous abortion among female semiconductor workers. Am J Indust Med 28(6):833–846.

Flipp, N, H Hunsaker, and P Herring. 1992. Investigation of hydride emissions during the maintenance of ion implantation equipment. Presented at the June 1992 American Industrial Hygiene Conference, Boston—Paper 379 (unpublished).

Goh, CL and SK Ng. 1987. Airborne contact dermatitis to colophony in soldering flux. Contact Dermatitis 17(2):89–93.

Hammond SK, CJ Hines MF Hallock, SR Woskie, S Abdollahzadeh, CR Iden, E Anson, F Ramsey, and MB Schenker. 1995. Tiered exposure assessment strategy in the Semiconductor Health Study. Am J Indust Med 28(6):661–680.

Harrison, RJ. 1986. Gallium arsenide. In State of the Art Reviews—Occupational Medicine: The Microelectronics Industry, edited by J LaDou Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus, Inc.

Hathaway, GL, NH Proctor, JP Hughes, and ML Fischman. 1991. Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 3rd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Hausen, BM, K Krohn, and E Budianto. 1990. Contact allergy due to colophony (VII). Sensitizing studies with oxidation products of abietic acid and related acids. Contact Dermat 23(5):352–358.

Health and Safety Commission. 1992. Approved Code of Practice—Control of Respiratory Sensitizers. London: Health and Safety Executive.

Helb, GK, RE Caffrey, ET Eckroth, QT Jarrett, CL Fraust, and JA Fulton. 1983. Plasma processing: Some safety, health and engineering considerations. Solid State Technology 24(8):185–194.

Hines, CJ, S Selvin, SJ Samuels, SK Hammond, SR Woskie, MF Hallock, and MB Schenker. 1995. Hierarchical cluster analysis for exposure assessment of workers in the Semiconductor Health Study. Am J Indust Med 28(6):713–722.

Horowitz, MR. 1992. Nonionizing radiation issues in a semiconductor R and D facility. Presented at the June 1992 American Industrial Hygiene Conference, Boston—Paper 122 (unpublished).

Jones, JH. 1988. Exposure and control assessment of semiconductor manufacturing. AIP Conf. Proc. (Photovoltaic Safety) 166:44–53.

LaDou, J (ed.). 1986. State of the Art Reviews—Occupational Medicine: The Microelectronics Industry. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley and Belfus, Inc.

Lassiter, DV. 1996. Work injury and illness surveillance on an international basis. Proceedings of the Third International ESH Conference, Monterey, CA.

Leach-Marshall, JM. 1991. Analysis of radiation detected from exposed process elements from the krypton-85 fine leak testing system. SSA Journal 5(2):48–60.

Lead Industries Association. 1990. Safety in Soldering, Health Guidelines for Solderers and Soldering. New York: Lead Industries Association, Inc.

Lenihan, KL, JK Sheehy, and JH Jones. 1989. Assessment of exposures in gallium arsenide processing: A case study. In Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing, edited by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.

Maletskos, CJ and PR Hanley. 1983. Radiation protection considerations of ion implantation systems. IEEE Trans on Nuclear Science NS-30:1592–1596.

McCarthy, CM. 1985. Worker Exposure during Maintenance of Ion Implanters in the Semiconductor Industry. Masters thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 1984. Summarized in Extended Abstracts, Electrochem Soc 85(2):448.

McCurdy SA, C Pocekay, KS Hammond, SR Woskie, SJ Samuels, and MB Schenker. 1995. A cross-sectional survey of respiratory and general health outcomes among semiconductor industry workers. Am J Indust Med 28(6):847–860.

McIntyre, AJ and BJ Sherin. 1989. Gallium arsenide: hazards, assessment, and control. Solid State Technology 32(9):119–126.

Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (MCC). 1994. Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap. Austin, TX: MCC.

—. 1996. Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap. Austin, TX: MCC.

Mosovsky, JA, D Rainer, T Moses and WE Quinn. 1992. Transient hydride generation during III-semiconductor processing. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 7(6):375–384.

Mueller, MR and RF Kunesh. 1989. Safety and health implications of dry chemical etchers. In Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing, edited by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.

O’Mara, WC. 1993. Liquid Crystal Flat Panel Displays. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

PACE Inc. 1994. Fume Extraction Handbook. Laurel, MD: PACE Inc.

Pastides, H, EJ Calabrese, DW Hosmer, Jr, and DR Harris. 1988. Spontaneous abortion and general illness symptoms among semiconductor manufacturers. J Occup Med 30:543–551.

Pocekay D, SA McCurdy, SJ Samuels, and MB Schenker. 1995. A cross-sectional study of musculoskeletal symptoms and risk factors in semiconductor workers. Am J Indust Med 28(6):861–871.

Rainer, D, WE Quinn, JA Mosovsky, and MT Asom. 1993. III-V transient hydride generation, Solid State Technology 36(6):35–40.

Rhoades, BJ, DG Sands, and VD Mattera. 1989. Safety and environmental control systems used in chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reactors at AT&T-Microelectronics-Reading. Appl Ind Hyg 4(5):105–109.

Rogers, JW. 1994. Radiation safety in semiconductors. Presented at the April 1994 Semiconductor Safety Association Conference, Scottsdale, AZ (unpublished).

Rooney, FP and J Leavey. 1989. Safety and health considerations of an x-ray lithography source. In Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing, edited by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.

Rosenthal, FS and S Abdollahzadeh. 1991. Assessment of extremely low frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields in microelectronics fabrication rooms. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 6(9):777–784.

Roychowdhury, M. 1991. Safety, industrial hygiene, and environmental considerations for MOCVD reactor systems. Solid State Technology 34(1):36–38.

Scarpace, L, M Williams, D Baldwin, J Stewart, and D Lassiter. 1989. Results of industrial hygiene sampling in semiconductor manufacturing operations. In Hazard Assessment and Control Technology in Semiconductor Manufacturing, edited by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.

Schenker MB, EB Gold, JJ Beaumont, B Eskenazi, SK Hammond, BL Lasley, SA McCurdy, SJ Samuels, CL Saiki, and SH Swan. 1995. Association of spontaneous abortion and other reproductive effects with work in the semiconductor industry. Am J Indust Med 28(6):639–659.

Schenker, M, J Beaumont, B Eskenazi, E Gold, K Hammond, B Lasley, S McCurdy, S Samuels, and S Swan. 1992. Final Report to the Semiconductor Industry Association—Epidemiologic Study of Reproductive and Other Health Effects among Workers Employed in the Manufacture of Semiconductors. Davis, CA: University of California.

Schmidt, R, H Scheufler, S Bauer, L Wolff, M Pelzing, and R Herzschuh. 1995. Toxicological investigations in the semiconductor industry: III: Studies on prenatal toxicity caused by waste products from aluminum plasma etching processes. Toxicol Ind Health 11(1):49–61.

SEMATECH. 1995. Silane Safety Transfer Document, 96013067 A-ENG. Austin, TX: SEMATECH.

—. 1996. Interprative Guide for SEMI S2-93 and SEMI S8-95. Austin, TX: SEMATECH.

Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA). 1995. World Semiconductor Sales Forecast Data. San Jose, CA: SIA.

Sheehy, JW and JH Jones. 1993. Assessment of arsenic exposures and controls in gallium arsenide production. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 54(2):61–69.

Sober, DJ. 1995. Selecting Laminates Using “Fitness for Use” Criteria, Surface Mount Technology (SMT). Libertyville, IL: IHS Publishing Group.

Wade, R, M Williams, T Mitchell, J Wong, and B Tusé. 1981. Semiconductor industry study. San Francisco, CA: California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health.